<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Poll: Which new 4E class are you looking forward to most and why?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://rpgcentric.com/poll-which-new-4e-class-are-you-most-looking-forward-to-and-why.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://rpgcentric.com/poll-which-new-4e-class-are-you-most-looking-forward-to-and-why.html</link>
	<description>One gamer's opinion of everything RPG</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 09 Jan 2012 15:16:21 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Psynister</title>
		<link>http://rpgcentric.com/poll-which-new-4e-class-are-you-most-looking-forward-to-and-why.html/comment-page-1#comment-2180</link>
		<dc:creator>Psynister</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2008 20:36:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rpgcentric.com/?p=742#comment-2180</guid>
		<description>The Shapeshifting Druid variant in 3.5 was one of the coolest, and most enjoyable characters I ever ran. Having that option be the standard of the 4e druid gets me way more excited than the other two combined. Finally having a second option for Controllers is another plus.

The Bard comes in at number 2, and they actually look like they could be decent this time. 

While the Barbarian is a cool character concept to play, we already have too many martial striker/defender classes to choose from. We need to widen the scope on the other side again and get in some more spell casters - particularly controllers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Shapeshifting Druid variant in 3.5 was one of the coolest, and most enjoyable characters I ever ran. Having that option be the standard of the 4e druid gets me way more excited than the other two combined. Finally having a second option for Controllers is another plus.</p>
<p>The Bard comes in at number 2, and they actually look like they could be decent this time. </p>
<p>While the Barbarian is a cool character concept to play, we already have too many martial striker/defender classes to choose from. We need to widen the scope on the other side again and get in some more spell casters &#8211; particularly controllers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wyatt</title>
		<link>http://rpgcentric.com/poll-which-new-4e-class-are-you-most-looking-forward-to-and-why.html/comment-page-1#comment-2179</link>
		<dc:creator>Wyatt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2008 02:18:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rpgcentric.com/?p=742#comment-2179</guid>
		<description>Being perfectly honest, none of &#039;em. I&#039;m having too much fun already with Core + Swordmage, and there are so many characters I want to play with just the classes I have (that and having fun expanding the classes with homebrew). But having to pick, Barbarian. I recently made a charging-focused Barbarian, refluffed to be more of an &quot;exudes aura of badass&quot; than &quot;RAAAR SMASH&quot;, and it&#039;s been hellishly fun testing her out. Even if she is really weirdly spec&#039;d (Barbarian/Spellscarred Savant, for fluff reasons.)

&lt;abbr&gt;&lt;em&gt;Wyatt´s last blog post..&lt;a href=&quot;http://wyattsalazar.wordpress.com/2008/12/03/heres-a-weird-one-4e-homebrew/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Here’s A Weird One (4e Homebrew)&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/abbr&gt;&lt;/em&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Being perfectly honest, none of &#8216;em. I&#8217;m having too much fun already with Core + Swordmage, and there are so many characters I want to play with just the classes I have (that and having fun expanding the classes with homebrew). But having to pick, Barbarian. I recently made a charging-focused Barbarian, refluffed to be more of an &#8220;exudes aura of badass&#8221; than &#8220;RAAAR SMASH&#8221;, and it&#8217;s been hellishly fun testing her out. Even if she is really weirdly spec&#8217;d (Barbarian/Spellscarred Savant, for fluff reasons.)</p>
<p><abbr><em>Wyatt´s last blog post..<a href="http://wyattsalazar.wordpress.com/2008/12/03/heres-a-weird-one-4e-homebrew/" rel="nofollow">Here’s A Weird One (4e Homebrew)</a></em></abbr></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dead Orcs</title>
		<link>http://rpgcentric.com/poll-which-new-4e-class-are-you-most-looking-forward-to-and-why.html/comment-page-1#comment-2178</link>
		<dc:creator>Dead Orcs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2008 01:49:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rpgcentric.com/?p=742#comment-2178</guid>
		<description>Yaay!  Good to see the Bard getting some love.  After being kick ass in version 1, essentially shelved in version 2, and horribly nerfed in version 3, I&#039;m looking forward to coverting my 3E Bard to a 4th Edition one.

&lt;abbr&gt;&lt;em&gt;Dead Orcs´s last blog post..&lt;a href=&quot;http://initorwhat.blogspot.com/2008/11/what-hell-we-supposed-ta-do-ya-mo-dron.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;What the Hell We Supposed ta Do, Ya&#039; Mo-dron!?&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/abbr&gt;&lt;/em&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yaay!  Good to see the Bard getting some love.  After being kick ass in version 1, essentially shelved in version 2, and horribly nerfed in version 3, I&#8217;m looking forward to coverting my 3E Bard to a 4th Edition one.</p>
<p><abbr><em>Dead Orcs´s last blog post..<a href="http://initorwhat.blogspot.com/2008/11/what-hell-we-supposed-ta-do-ya-mo-dron.html" rel="nofollow">What the Hell We Supposed ta Do, Ya&#8217; Mo-dron!?</a></em></abbr></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: reveal</title>
		<link>http://rpgcentric.com/poll-which-new-4e-class-are-you-most-looking-forward-to-and-why.html/comment-page-1#comment-2171</link>
		<dc:creator>reveal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Dec 2008 20:20:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rpgcentric.com/?p=742#comment-2171</guid>
		<description>@Donny - I think it will happen in 4E! ;)

@Sebastian - I loved playing a monk in 3E. If Wizards releases a preview for 4E, I&#039;ll add it to the poll!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Donny &#8211; I think it will happen in 4E! <img src='http://rpgcentric.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>@Sebastian &#8211; I loved playing a monk in 3E. If Wizards releases a preview for 4E, I&#8217;ll add it to the poll!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sebastian</title>
		<link>http://rpgcentric.com/poll-which-new-4e-class-are-you-most-looking-forward-to-and-why.html/comment-page-1#comment-2170</link>
		<dc:creator>Sebastian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Dec 2008 20:00:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rpgcentric.com/?p=742#comment-2170</guid>
		<description>No monk! I&#039;m casting my vote for monk! I think it will really work out with the 4th edition power system. Come on monk, PHB3!!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No monk! I&#8217;m casting my vote for monk! I think it will really work out with the 4th edition power system. Come on monk, PHB3!!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Donny_the_DM</title>
		<link>http://rpgcentric.com/poll-which-new-4e-class-are-you-most-looking-forward-to-and-why.html/comment-page-1#comment-2167</link>
		<dc:creator>Donny_the_DM</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Dec 2008 19:56:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rpgcentric.com/?p=742#comment-2167</guid>
		<description>Bard...because I&#039;ve always been curious to see one that didn&#039;t suck :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bard&#8230;because I&#8217;ve always been curious to see one that didn&#8217;t suck <img src='http://rpgcentric.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

